Cracked LCD- Firefly: The Board Game in Review

FireflyBoardGame

If you’re looking at licensing a cult TV show to a board games manufacturer, I’ve got a hot tip for you. Gale Force Nine and the crack team of Aaron Dill, John Kovaleski, and Sean Sweigart should be at the top of your meeting schedule. This company (previously known primarily as a maker of miniatures gaming supplies) and these designers are two for two with last year’s Cracked LCD Game of the Year shortlister Spartacus: A Game of Blood and Treachery and this year’s outstanding board game based on the almost fanatically revered (and short-lived) Firefly TV series.

I’m convinced that when these guys sit down to design a licensed game, they write down “what do fans of this property want to do in a board game” on the top of a sheet of paper and then make a list. Then they apply the structure, mechanics, and process in such a way that lets the players do exactly those things. This design sense is what makes games like Dune and Battlestar Galactica so rich in setting and conceptual theming, and the new Firefly game slides right into the roster of really great licensed titles that totally hit the mark.

But here’s the funny thing. I’m actually not much of a Firefly fan. I actively hated the show for years, despising its too-cute, too-clever dialogue and a little too much of Joss Whedon’s almost clinical nerd demographic pandering. So when this game was announced, I kind of shrugged at it. But then I saw that the Spartacus team was on it, and was interested at least at that level regardless of my relative disinterest in the show.

So here’s the scoop on the subject matter up front. If you’re a toboggan-wearing, Jayne Cobb quoting Browncoat, you’re going to be happily inundated with fan service, stills, quotes and most importantly gameplay that totally represents the capricious space pirate/western theme of the show. The emphasis is on the crew and situations of varying moral character more than on hardware and space opera. If you’re not a big damn hero and don’t know a gorram thing about why they won’t take the sky from Wash’s lucky dinosaurs, what you’re putting on the table remains a damn good space adventure full of cowboys, crooks and commerce.

The framework- start out with a ship and some seed money and set out to complete deliveries or other tasks, improving your ability to do so over the course of the game- isn’t terribly different than Merchant of Venus or Merchants and Marauders. It says right on the box what you do in the game (in the words of captain Malcolm Reynolds)- “Find a crew, get a job, keep flying”.  There are a couple of scenario cards that provide you with the overall agenda for each game- making money, making contacts, or completing certain tasks. There’s a great solo option available as well.

Starting off with a Firefly-class transport ship and some seed credits clenched in the fist of Malcolm or another captain, you’ll pilot your ship around the ‘Verse taking jobs for criminal, government, or capitalist contacts. These are generally either pick-up-and-deliver missions or (mis)adventures that may require you to complete skill checks depicted as part of events drawn from the “Aim to Misbehave” deck. Most jobs require you to have certain skills or traits among the crew you’ve hopefully hired along the way, and upon completion you’ll have to divide the spoils up with your people or they’ll get demoralized and can be hired away by another player. They’ll also take a demoralized token if they’re moral and you take on an immoral job.

I love that many of the Aim to Misbehave cards and other adventure elements throughout the game offer either one or two alternatives to pass them- you might get a choice to shoot your way out of a situation at the risk of losing crew or taking on an arrest warrant or you may be able to risk a harder diplomacy check with only the risk of failure. Like Merchants and Marauders, there’s a sense that the game is occurring in a moral gray area and players are free to vacillate between legal and illegal choices with certain consequences. I also love that the game uses  one of the greatest  mechanics of all time- the exploding six, whereby you reroll any sixes ad infinitum- so that no test is actually impossible and your narrative might include some incredible instance where you really were a Big Damn Hero.

There’s just enough detail to bring out some of the show’s key concepts. Do illegal things like harbor crew members with warrants or transport contraband and the mutually-controlled Alliance Cruiser might flash the blue lights and pull you over for an inspection. Travel through the less-civilized border zones and you might find your ship overtaken by the dreaded Reavers.  You can buy everything from ship components to knives at the various planetary markets. Hire on the volatile and unpredictable guinea pig River Tam, who may or may not help you to ace every skill check in the game and then do what you’ve got to do to get her brother Simon on board to make the most of her potential.

You’ve also got to be concerned about fuel usage throughout the game. Every time you “burn”, you spend a fuel token which also takes up half of one of your ship’s cargo slots. During flight, you’ll flip over cards from a travel deck that usually say “Keep flying” but some have some random encounters on them- salvage ops, Alliance Cruiser movement, Reaver movement, or other events including some that might require you to spend spare parts tokens to keep flying. Here again, you might find yourself making a decision to stop and help someone, thus slowing down your trip, or flying on while pissing off your moral crew members.  I really like that at its heart, Firefly is as much an adventure game about people and leadership as it is a mercantile one about work and profit.

But it is most definitely not a combat game, and anyone expecting space battles or direct conflict between players is going to be disappointed. The multiplayer game has some friction especially with that fun crew-stealing rule, all players moving the Alliance and Reaver ships to harass others, and possible trading.  But like Merchant of Venus, Firefly is usually a race to see who can make the most money or meet whatever goals there are the quickest.  The paper money looks like a million bucks because that’s what you’re going to be after for most of the game. Victory points just wouldn’t seem right in this design.

Everybody understands making money, and I think everybody that likes both money-making and science fiction games will find a lot to enjoy regardless of the degree of attachment with the show. It’s a very accessible title despite a rulebook that could use a good revision to clarify some things. A two hour playtime keeps things crisp and rarely boring. I didn’t really notice it until my third or fourth game, but I like that there are never more than six pieces on the map at any time- no counters, markers, tracking chits, flags, neutral units, or anything like that. Just your ships and space. Granted, offboard each player has to manage their ship board’s cargo holds and any crew or equipment cards on hand as well as the job cards they’ve taken, but there’s really not a whole lot to keep track of or monitor while you’re playing.

I think it’s a testament to the strength of the Firefly board game that playing it prompted me to go back and give the show another chance. I spent more than a couple of happy evenings watching the show and playing the solo game. I actually enjoyed the show more this time around because I watched it on its own merits and far removed from any of the bizarre cultist hype, and I found that my enjoyment of the game was enhanced by having a greater sense of the setting and characters. What’s more, it made me appreciate even more how comprehensively Gale Force Nine has delivered the definitive Firefly gaming experience.

8 Responses to “Cracked LCD- Firefly: The Board Game in Review”

  1. Dorkmaster Flek December 5, 2013 at 3:13 pm #

    I’ll spare you my evangelizing, as this is my favourite TV series of all time. :) I may have to check this out solely due to the license, but if they actually managed to make a good board game out of it, I’m sold!

    • Michael Barnes December 5, 2013 at 4:20 pm #

      Go buy yourself a Christmas present. This is the game for you. If you love the show, you’re going to flip out over it.

  2. ccTheToph December 5, 2013 at 3:46 pm #

    It’s a good game. Of course, I like the TV show, and Merchant of Venus and Merchants & Marauders are two of my all time favorite games, so I may have been the ideal audience for it.

    One unrelated note – thanks for the “Godzilla – Half Century War” suggestion, Michael. My son and I both loved it.

  3. Michael Barnes December 5, 2013 at 4:21 pm #

    Great to hear! Such a cool book, my favorite Godzilla story ever.

    Yeah, this is definitely a MoV/M&M style game…which I really love, so that all works out just fine for me. Now that I like (but not love) the show, that works out just fine too.

  4. Gormongous December 5, 2013 at 4:21 pm #

    I’m glad you liked it, Barnes. When I played it the first time, I was ambivalent, because I’m not much for a pick-up-and-deliver game with no frisson between players, but it was really incredible that the theme made up for when the mechanics fell short and vice versa. It’s a game I can’t wait to get to the table with even one Firefly fan, which is saying more than a lot of the other games in my closet. Thanks for the review!

  5. Todd Brakke December 5, 2013 at 6:59 pm #

    Over the weekend I picked up the iOS port of Lords of Waterdeep. Because I like worker placement games, I’ve rather enjoyed it so far, but Sunday morning I played three games of it and then went to a friend’s to play Firefly. You could not have a stronger contrast than these two games when it comes to making use of a theme/license effectively. Waterdeep’s D&D usage is wholly ignorable. It’s just a bunch of colored cubes moved from place to place and there’s no reason to care about any of the D&D underpinnings. Firefly’s theme and mechanics are sewn so well together that neither aspect would be as good without the other. A brilliant, brilliant game.

    (One of my buddies spent the first 45 minutes saying how he didn’t like the game. A couple days ago he told me he went out and bought it.)

  6. timzania December 12, 2013 at 2:26 pm #

    Picked this up a few months ago, though sadly I’ve only managed to play twice. Hoping for some more board gaming time around the holidays.

    One problem we encountered the first game is that we foolishly selected a story card at random, assuming they were all more or less similar in terms of difficulty, but they are very much not, and we happened to choose the most difficult. The website provides a new beginners’ story card which is much more appropriate for beginners.

    I’ve heard a few people criticize the player interaction, but I wonder if the trading and crew-stealing aspects will become more significant as players gain experience and play more aggressively. For instance if you have a large, valuable crew it can be much cheaper to take them for shore leave instead of paying them, but in the games I’ve played so far everyone always pays their crew rather than taking the risk of a disgruntled token.

    Similarly there tend to be relationships/combos (explicit or implicit) between various items of gear/crew/upgrades so there is potentially a lot of opportunity for purchashing things that other players would have a major use for. This requires paying a lot of attention to what’s going on with everyone so it’s unlikely for first-timers. My group doesn’t have a ton of experience with this kind of game though so I don’t know if the optional interactions will turn out to be important.

    • Gormongous December 12, 2013 at 3:17 pm #

      If you can take the risk, not paying your crew and then giving them shore leave is vastly more profitable. In a recent game, one of the players built a very effective playstyle around such a strategy, and it was only when the rest of us started swarming in like vultures after every job he completed that he had to start picking and choosing.

      I actually think that the moral/immoral choice is the least interesting one. Moral crew members are almost always the best, but you can’t short-change them on an immoral job or they’ll defect, so the answer is almost always to take moral jobs or have a less optimal crew. I need to have me a think about that.

Leave a Reply:

Gravatar Image

You must be logged in to post a comment.