Erratic European publisher Queen Games has just managed to get its re-issue of Wallenstein (affectionately known as Wally to its fans) to the shelves of shops in over this side of the Atlantic. Previously printed in 2002, only available in German, and sold out to boot, the new edition is language independent and includes some expansions built-in. It’s ostensibly a game about the effects of thirty-years war in Renaissance Germany but the history of the game is, arguably, more interesting than the history it purports to depict.
You see Wallenstein belongs very firmly to the European school of game design. That means an emphasis on balanced starting positions and opportunities and strategy and a shift away from randomness and player interaction. In its extreme this paradigm results in sterile, tedious “spreadsheet games” where players are only competing in terms of finding the most efficient way to leverage a mathematical game system. But Wallenstein was an early example of a rebellion against that sterility, an attempt to find a middle ground whereby the best things about European games could be captured while still allowing the players to interact directly and compete meaningfully. It belongs to a small, but growing, genre of games known as “Waros” (Euors with war, gettit?). It’s small because design wise it’s a very hard balancing act to get right, but it’s growing because when it is done right the results are often spectacular. Critically acclaimed games like Eclipse and my personal favourite Imperial belong roughly in this category.
It turns out there are actually quite a number of ways to allow players to tear chunks out of one another without spoiling balance or allowing the various bogeymen of player interaction that spring from players ganging up on one another to enter the game. Wallenstein takes perhaps the simplest: players have a fixed number of actions to undertake each turn and of these, aggressive actions form a small subset. So you simply don’t have enough opportunity to fight with your neighbours to allow alliances to determine the game, and indeed the scarcity of attack actions encourages you to use the optimally rather than waste them on grudges. But – and this is key – you can still do both these things if you like. The result is a pretty compelling game that can be sterile at times but which often manges to grab the best of both worlds.
Wallenstein’s other innovation, which remains unique in my experience, is the cube tower. The cube tower is an amazing invention that allows a strong random element in combat whilst almost guaranteeing that, unlike dice, the swings of luck will even out across all the players over the course of the game. It’s a tall cardboard tower inside which are several levels consisting of sheets of cardboard with small holes scattered irregularly across them. When players fight, they pour all the cubes representing the forces in the battle into the top of the tower. On the way down some will get trapped, some will dislodge cubes already inside and some make it all the way to the bottom and come out. The player who has more cubes that emerge from the bottom is the winner, and those that fail to come out are deemed to have been killed in combat. It’s a clever mechanic that’s really exciting and fun to use and, of course, if you get unlucky and have a bunch of cubes stuck in the tower from one battle, you’re guaranteed they’ll come out later to help out you.
The system was basically copied wholesale for another release, Shogun. The main difference was the map which, being based on Japan, is long and narrow rather than square like the representation of Germany in the Wallenstein map. It also has two sides in Shogun with slightly different border areas and sea routes. This has lead to slightly idiotic debates between fans of the two as to which is best. In Wallenstein players who end up with a lot of territory in the middle are at a disadvantage because they can be attacked from all sides. In Shogun there isn’t a middle so it doesn’t have this problem, but it also means there tends to be less attacks and that they get focused between the same players as adjoining borders are limited. Personally I prefer the greater interaction of Wallenstein and the theme too, and I also like one of the other differences which is random events: they’re global and affect all players equally in Shogun whereas in Wallenstein they’re tied to areas of the board and can affect some players more than others and I prefer the greater chaos.
But both are still excellent games, even if the “Waro” concept has been refined somewhat since they were released. If you want to get a feel for the system that underpins both games, you can play Wallenstein via email on Spiel By Web (along with Santiago, another one of my favourite European style games). I have no idea how they implement the cube tower in computer code, but it’s way less amusing than in real life. And personally I think everyone should get to play with one of those cool cube towers at least once.
11 thoughts to “Of Wallies and Waros”
I have Shogun; I picked it up back when it was damned unclear if it would ever come back in Wallenstein form.
Only played it the once, but it was fabulous fun.
I love the dice tower, you pretty much sum up everything great about it
Santiago is also in my personal top ten. It is amazing a game that good exists about a topic so damn boring.
Ok…if I have Shogun and love it, do I need Wally? I have always wanted to play that vesion…
They’re so similar there’s very little point indeed in owning both. Try the PBEM version if you want to be sure.
Wallenstein is one of the best Eurogames of all time. It’s very structured, but there’s a strategic fludity in the design that makes it very, very interesting- and fun- to play. It’s definitely a sort of mutant dudes on a map game, but with pretty much all the usual turn phases and details managed with a programmed action schematic. Usually, I don’t care for programmed actions but it totally works here.
I really like how battles are limited yet typically _devastating_ for one side or the other. You have a small number of very impactful fights in the game rather than turn after turn of tit-for-tat.
The cube tower is, of course, awesome. It’s totally flaky, absolutely random, and you’ll find yourself wonderin where the hell all of those farmers came from every time. But it’s the chaotic monkey wrench this kind of game needs to make it sizzle.
Of all the games I’ve ever traded, I think I regret trading Wallenstein the most. I got Shogun and thought “well, that’s the end of Wallenstein”. Yet I wound up liking the Wallenstein map, setting, and artwork better. Shogun is very good, but Wallenstein is _great_.
As for Queen, erratic is putting it nicely! They actually did another game using the exact same cube tower before Wallenstein, this goofy crusades game called Im Zeichen Des Kruzes. It’s totally fucked up, but it’s really fun to play. You control a crusading knight and his army, and the goal is to make it from Europe to Jerusalem and lay siege, taking the city. Along the way, you can stop in villages to pray…or you can pillage them for money. Yee haw. The rules are a wreck and it’s probably broken by most people’s standards, but I liked it. And you’re throwing knights and Muslims into the cube tower to duke it out. It’s never been available in English.
Sell Shogun to bankroll a Wallenstein purchase. Coolstuffinc.com shows it as Jan/Feb release. So likely March.
Really? It’s in the shops already this side of the pond so I’d be surprised if it took that long.
It’s Queen, Matt. Queen.
D’oh, of course. And there was me highlighting how unreliable they were in the opening paragraph and forgetting.
Y’know I was going to buy a copy of Wallenstein hot of the press so I emailed my favoured supplier and asked them for a release date, and they asked Queen and Queen told them sod all. So, figuring it could be months, I put in an order for Mage Knight and some other stuff. And very day after he dispatched it they announced it’d be in the shops in Europe the following week. Useless bastards. So now if I want a copy I have to pay extra shipping on it.
Yep, Shogun is one of our “go to” games.
I REALLY want Wallenstein just for the different map
If the different map changes the dynamic, it’s still not worth it?
558580 901500Good 1, there is truly some excellent facts on this post some of my subscribers may possibly locate this valuable, will send them a link, several thanks. 921124