Skip to main content

Why the Internet is Full of $#!t About Destiny’s Story

Destiny-Logo-XBox-One-PS4Like many of you, I’ve been playing Destiny. I’ve mostly retired from playing AAA video games for a number of reasons documented here at NHS and elsewhere, but a new game from the creators of Halo was compelling enough to get me to go to Gamestop- for the midnight release, no less- to pick up a copy of this big-budget blockbuster. Because Bungie understands video games better than many other developers. They understand play, and the Halo games have always excelled at providing players with lots of ways to engage their content. Their mechanics are impeccable and their games are thankfully free of the kinds of negative, hateful “let the bodies hit the floor” style violence so common in other popular action games.

But one thing Bungie has never been good at is telling a story.

Let’s face it, if you were over the age of 18 or so when the first Halo came out then you’re old enough to realize that the success of Bungie’s world-building and lore-crafting has more to do with their James Cameron-like sense of military detail and production design grounded in practicality. The actual writing, the dialogue that spills out of the mouths of Master Chief, Cortana and…that other guy…is atrocious. The plotting is nebulous at best, nonsensical and incoherent at worst. Dialogue is mostly of the sort that sounds really awesome when you’re 15. Tropes flood the games, watering down the most successful parts of the story- there is a mega-weapon called the Halo. Aliens shoot at you unless you shoot them first.

READ ALSO:  Cracked LCD- GOTY 2012 Expansions in Review

Coming back to Destiny, one of the common complaints that discussion forums and comments are neck-deep in this week is that the Destiny story “sucks” or is practically non-existence. There is a sense of disappointment that there’s no Master Chief-like character to anchor the action. Folks are upset that there isn’t more of a sense of world-crafting or specific narrative upon which to hang all of the alien-shooting.

At first, I’ll admit I felt that too, that it was missing a narrative binding to hold together the outstanding, finely tuned gameplay. But then I realized after a few hours that not only was I thankful that Bungie abandoned both their own storytelling techniques from last generation, but also the faux-Hollywood methods that have poisoned AAA game development by shoving gameplay to the back of the bus in favor of non-interactive spectacle.

Instead, it seems that Bungie took a cue from the Souls game rather than The Last of Us. The story of Destiny is effectively told in two pieces. One piece, the most important one, is in what you as a player do with your character over the course of the game. The weapons, missions, social connections, discoveries and events are the story. It’s not told in non-interactive cut-scenes. It’s not told in a vast, open world filled with NPCs spouting canned sentences.

But the other piece of the Destiny story is the more interesting one. Bungie has opted to do something that is almost never popular with the proletariat. They decided to create the world, the story of Destiny almost entirely through vague suggestion, imagery and wilful exclusion of detail.

READ ALSO:  Cracked LCD- Summoner Wars IOS in Review: The Promised Land

Even if you’ve just played the alpha or beta, you can see this in the Russian area of the game. You know about the Traveller, some vague suggestions that it has some kind of function similar to the Monolith in 2001. There’s a couple of different alien species that have sort of waylaid humanity’s expansion into space. There’s a mysterious power called “the Light”. And then the Guardians, sort of ranger-warriors fighting to preserve what’s left of humanity.

It’s clear when you first walk out into post-Collapse Russia that something went down. There doesn’t need to be any more detail than what is shown. You see downed, ancient jet fighters and tanks. There’s that amazing vista of the Cosmodome, its launch pad prepped for launch but in a state of arrested function. Do you really want there to be a cut scene that shows you exactly what happened, or would you rather engage your imagination and wonder?

There are, of course, some minor details supplied by Peter Dinklage’s much-maligned, disaffected line readings. There are bits of background story amorphously suggested here and there- the names of guns, systems of nomenclature, allusions to organization and culture. But the vast majority of what happened and is happening is implied, not enumerated. I think this was a brilliant decision, and one that is already divisive. They went gameplay first in it, but they took a much more sophisticated approach to world-building and storytelling than I expected.

Destiny, in a lot of ways, shows how Bungie is very much trying to sort out what exactly a next generation FPS game looks like. It’s a highly studied, carefully constructed game that draws from a number of trends in game design from the past several years. It’s surprisingly experimental for a game with a gazillion dollar budget, but it plays it very safe in terms of actual gameplay. Yet they’re skirting close to (and actively) antagonizing gamers by witholding “lore” details.

READ ALSO:  Cracked LCD- Triassic Terror in Review

I applaud Bungie for taking a big chance by jettisoning the weakest part of the Halo formula. I’m really quite stunned that they dared to dare players to use their imaginations, to tell their own story through gameplay rather than by parading didactic fake cinema across the screen and calling it a “game”. Once again, the internet dogpile mob has demonstrated that it can’t be trusted when it comes to opinions and analysis about video games.

Michael Barnes

Games writer Michael Barnes is a co-founder of as well as His trolling has been published on the Web and in print in at least two languages and in three countries. His special ability is to cheese off nerds using the power of the Internet and his deep, dark secret is that he's actually terrible at games. Before you ask, no, the avatar is not him. It's Mark E. Smith of The Fall.

9 thoughts to “Why the Internet is Full of $#!t About Destiny’s Story”

  1. I agree about the story. I always hated the story in the Halo games so just get it out of the way. That being said, I do wish that I didn’t have to go online to read the grimoire cards. I love those cheesy lore bits to browse while in the menus.

  2. I’ve yet to start playing (but traded my Xbox One for a second PS4 so we can play a few new online co-op games).

    I would guess that the problem isn’t the story, but the characters. Most video games have terrible cliche-ridden stories. While Halo’s story was lame, you remember Cortana. She was your basic smart-mouth Jane-inspired AI, but she was at least a memorable character.

    Another good example is Borderlands. Totally vague throwaway story with some similarities to Destiny. But every single NPC is memorable, even if you are offended or annoyed by half of them. (Claptrap doesn’t react when you peg him with a rocket launcher.)

    And no one whines as much about Borderlands lack of story. Admittedly, they did release Assault on Dragon’s Keep, which is one of the better stories in a AAA game in recent memory. It is loopy and scattershot, but also deals with a little girl trying to cope with the loss of a friend in a mundane and geeky way.

  3. When you sell a game based on a narrative, one better hope said game has one that isn’t a convoluted, disjointed, uninspired mess. Not even Dinklage’s terrible voice overs with zero enthusiasm save it. The story is down right terrible, the internet is not wrong in this.

  4. Michael are you planning to get bloodborne when it comes out for the ps4? It looks pretty darn interesting and having the team that made demon souls and the original dark souls, sounds like it will be very likely that bloodborne will be a great game!

  5. You got me sir. I played the introductory level of the game, got to the guardians tower or whatever, and stopped. I thought to myself, what I really want to play is a game where I can create a character and explore a world in a way I believe that character would. So I fired up Dark Souls for the fourth time (never making it farther than the Undead Burg) to do just that because I thought, this is Bungie and Activision, there is no way I’ll be able to have that kind of free form experience here. Now you are telling me I could have had just that experience. I will definitely be going back after I finish my play through of Dark Souls (which I might actually finish this time). Thank you for the article.

  6. Thank you for your refreshing perspective on Destiny’s story design. But I do think you’ve given them far too much credit.

    Perhaps it was wishful thinking to expect the studio behind the Halo series to suddenly turn the corner and become master storytellers without some sort of intervening stepping stone to bridge the gap. Your assessment of Halo’s lackluster and juvenile storytelling is spot on but sadly, many of its worst tendencies remain Destiny.

    I see where Bungie wanted to pull away from the traditionally non-linear approach to narrative. I see now that the Grimoire cards are shunted off to the companion app because there is already enough busywork within the game to occupy the player. This also has a side effect of adding value to the app and by improving engagement and “churn” in between your Destiny play sessions. It was a minor inconvenience at first but now I see the reasoning behind this design decision.

    The problem with Destiny is that they didn’t go far enough in this respect. There was likely a corporate mandate or enough directors at Bungie got cold feet about completely removing all semblance of Hollywood-style storytelling devices. The problem is what little trace we have in terms of overt “story stuff” is very poor. The handful of unskippable cutscenes are not good. The dialogue is not good. There are no meaningful relationships beyond that of currying favour with this faction or that faction. It’s all a bit soulless.

    Bungie has created a rough framework within which a compelling story COULD be told. There is at once an incredible amount of detail in the lore and an annoying sense of vagueness that pervades everything. This vaguenes – most notably demonstrated by the unimaginative noun-based proper names – is what frustrates me the most and makes it easy for me to write it off as general incompetence.

    I think it’s important to highlight Bungie’s weaknesses as a storyteller. They seem very pleased with their own storytelling prowess and frankly I’ve never understood how this over confidence first took root. They are simply not as good as they think they are. If Destiny is going to be some sort of quality bar for how game stories are done then it’s no wonder so many novice game designers are clamouring for those mythical “narrative designer” positions.

  7. I just like the helpful info you supply on your articles.

    I’ll bookmark your blog and check again right here frequently.

    I am fairly certain I will learn lots of new stuff right here!

    Good luck for the next!

  8. Asking questions are actually pleasant thing if you are not understanding something completely, however this article provides fastidious understanding yet.

  9. Aw, this was a really good post. Taking a few minutes and actual effort to make a really good article… but what can I say… I hesitate a
    lot and never manage to get anything done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *